are viewed more favorably than equally qualified applicants with less common names. Participants in one group read a resume of a job applicant with a

are viewed more favorably than equally qualified applicants with less common names. Participants in one group read a resume of a job applicant with a common name; participants in the other group read the same resume but the applicant had an uncommon name. There were five participants in each group. The results showed that the difference in the evaluation of the applicants was not significant (p = .22). a. Identify the independent variable(s) (DO NOT write a complete sentence; identify ONLY what is specified; 2 points): b. Identify the LEVELS of the independent variable(s) c. Identify the dependent variable(s) d. Specify the null hypothesis (2 points): e. Specify the research hypothesis (2 points): f. Is this a 1-tailed or a 2-tailed test (2 points): g. Based on the results, the researcher should (2 points): reject the null hypothesis. or accept the null hypothesis? h. Based on your answer to the last question, if the outcome of the research is not truly reflective of the population, which type of error might the researcher have made (2 points): Type I or Type II? i. Given what you know about the study, what might you tell the researcher about the possible reasons for the nonsignificant results? ( use complete sentence(s) for this answer; 2 points)